|
posted By ant, 5 January 2009 1:42:41 PM
lee can't be moved in the summer.he becomes a free agent this summer.
posted By wmaxey, 5 January 2009 1:47:25 PM
i hear you ant. it's more referring to the chances of lee relocating during the summer versus during the season.
posted By jtest, 5 January 2009 1:50:06 PM
good story, now can you explain this to the other staff writers who think D'antoni actually wants to trade lee. Because if lee doesnt fit well in dantonis system why oh why would he be optomistic on currys return!
posted By wmaxey, 5 January 2009 2:06:29 PM
thanks jtest....hoping to ask mike his thoughts on the matter when the knicks come through portland next month. for now though i will say, i find it hard to believe any coach wouldn't want what david lee has to offer. even if the knock is he's slow on defense, it's hard to argue with his numbers. you know?
posted By Ripcity4life, 5 January 2009 2:12:41 PM
Is this source the same one who told Hoopsworld the Shaun Livingston was going to be a Blazer. LOL
However is all seriousness i am not surprised i expected when i woke up this morning to see this rumor dead or close to it.
posted By Will Wiens, 5 January 2009 2:28:49 PM
I sure hope you are wrong Wendell, i would love Lee in Portland. Too bad my love can't make a trade happen.
posted By wmaxey, 5 January 2009 2:42:17 PM
ripcity4life....i even have to laugh at that one. sometimes we are right. sometimes we are wrong. that's just the nature of the business. and with the trade deadline right around the corner, we are bound to hear - and discuss - a lot of these type of things. and will.....sorry bro, you are on your own with the whole "love" thing.
posted By wiz4life, 5 January 2009 4:09:23 PM
ive only seen him play a few times, but is Channing Frye really that much of a liability at PF? McMillan must not think to highly of him if they need a backup for Aldridge and Frye is only playing 12 minutes a gm.
posted By wiz4life, 5 January 2009 4:14:27 PM
actually just tell me if he still plays like mark blount. because if he plays like blount then id understand why they want a backup for Aldrige
posted By wmaxey, 5 January 2009 4:46:51 PM
frye has fallen out of the rotation after being aldridge's back-up for much of this season....his shot is usually on. but when it's not, it tends to showcase his other shortcomings - defense and toughness.
posted By Tater, 5 January 2009 6:19:13 PM
LaM Aldridge averages over 35 minutes a game, so unless they're planning on getting rid of him it wouldn't make sense to bring in Lee. Lee will be eligible for a big extension this summer, which would make him an expensive backup. I realize he also plays center for NY, but the Blazers have the minutes there covered as well with two true centers.
posted By V, 5 January 2009 7:39:12 PM
I would be down if knicks get camby, send lee and jeffries to portland, and clips get bayless, frye, and someone else.....maybe outlaw or webster.....would be a bad trade for portland, but i can dream.
posted By wiz4life, 5 January 2009 10:10:13 PM
well then from now on hes Channing "Mark Blount" Frye
posted By Pete, 5 January 2009 10:32:25 PM
I thought Portland was really high on Bayless, what's up with him being "available" now? Frye, Diogu, Raef, Sergio, maybe Blake, maybe Outlaw are the only ones in my mind that are worth talking about. Besides, why would Portland make any moves before Webster comes back?
posted By andrew, 5 January 2009 10:38:24 PM
whats more laughable is the thought that camby can be had for a scrub like q-rich. hes hardly an upgrade from fred jones.
posted By wmaxey, 6 January 2009 12:32:35 AM
pete....this time of year, you are going to hear a lot of names tossed about...bayless just happened to make the cut in this case. people will pinpoint the blazers back court because they have the pieces to work with. the tough part right now is trying to figure out if bayless fits in portland as a point guard or shooting guard....some say neither.
|