HOOPSWORLD
By the Numbers: CP3 Deserved MVP

By: Tommy Beer   Last Updated: 5/6/08 7:14 AM ET | 1896 times read
Increase Font Size
Decrease Font Size
Adjust font size:

According to numerous published reports, it appears that Kobe Bryant will soon be named the NBA's MVP.

While there is no denying that Kobe had a fantastic season, he wasn't the league's most valuable player.  Unfortunately, he may get a number of votes as a sort of 'lifetime achievement award.'  That's unfair if that is the case.  Voters should base their votes on each candidate's play during the 2007-2008 NBA regular season, not each player's career.

And if you look at the stats each candidate complied this season, the award belongs on Chris Paul's trophy case.  

Yes, LeBron was unstoppable at times, KG spearheaded the greatest turnaround in NBA history, and Kobe's season was unquestionably superb.  But no one was more valuable than Chris Paul.  Period. 

His superlative personal statistics aside, Paul's impact on his teammates has been phenomenal.  The main cogs on the Hornets roster are relatively young and inexperienced, but CP3 carried them to 56-26 record, good enough for the second seed in the ultra-competitive Western Conference.

And the numbers shouldn't be the sole deciding factor, but if you look closely at the stats CP3 put up this season, they are truly staggering.  While intangibles such as leadership and nebulous concepts such as "making your teammates better" are difficult to measure, the one thing we can clearly quantify is the statistical bottom line.  And looking at Paul's end of the season numbers is awe-inspiring.

So that is what we are going to do in this article - take an in-depth look at some of the remarkable stats Chris Paul authored over the last six months. 

*****

Chris Paul finished the 2007-2008 NBA season averaging 21.1 points, 11.6 assists, 4 rebounds, 2.7 steals, and 1.2 made three-pointers per game.  He shot 48.8% from the field and 85% from the free-throw line. 

Now, let's put those numbers in perspective:

* In the 61-year history of the league, there have only been seven players to finish a season with averages of at least 20 points and 10 assists.  The other members of this prestigious 20/10 club are Oscar Robertson, Magic Johnson, Isiah Thomas, Kevin Johnson, Tim Hardaway, Nate "Tiny" Archibald, and, surprisingly, Michael Adams (26.5 and 10.5 in '90-'91).

* No player has accomplished this impressive 20/10 feat in over 15 years.  Timmy Hardaway was the last to do so back in 1992-1993.

* CP3 also led the league in steals.  As if the points, assists, rebounds, solid FG% and FT% weren't enough, Paul helped control the game on the defensive end as well. 

Since the NBA began tracking steals as an official statistic back in 1972, no player in history has ever averaged 20 and 10 while also leading the league in thefts.  The last player to lead the NBA in steals and assists was John Stockton back '91-'92. 

* The only true point guard to win the MVP since Magic Johnson in his prime was Steve Nash, who took home the honors in both the '04-'05 and '05-'06 seasons.  Compared with Nash's best seasons, including his back-to-back MVP campaigns, Paul averaged more points, equal to or greater assists, more rebounds, far more steals, and fewer turnovers.  Basically, CP3's stats are like Steve Nash's numbers on steroids.  In addition, Paul doesn't have nearly as talented a supporting cast as Nash, nor does he play in the same fantasy-friendly offense. 

* Speaking of Nash, CP3 played some of his best basketball against some of the best point guards in the league.  Here is a stat to help illustrate this point:  In four head-to-head meetings with the Suns this season, Paul (44) had one more assist than Nash (43) while outscoring him by an average of more than 10 points per game (29.0 to 18.8).

* Paul recorded 30 games this season with 20 or more points and 10 or more assists. That's the most 20/10 games in a season since Tim Hardaway did it 34 times for the 1991-92 Warriors.

* In a win over the Warriors back on April 5th, Chris Paul racked up 16 points, 10 rebounds, 13 assists and five steals.  Per the Elias Sports Bureau: "It was the third game of Paul's brief NBA career in which he reached those levels in all four categories. The only other active player to have such a game is Jason Kidd, and he's done it only once (Nets vs. Magic, Feb. 23, 2003).  Paul's three games meeting those minimums (16 PTS, 10 REB, 13 AST, 5 STL) match the most for any NBA player since the league began keeping track of steals in 1973-74. Magic Johnson and Micheal Ray Richardson are the only other players with three such games."
 
* Paul became the first player in over 25 years to lead the league in assists while still averaging fewer than 3 turnovers per game. (The last player to accomplish that feat was Johnny Moore back in 1981-1982.) 

* Following up on the previous entry, Johnny Moore averaged 9.65 assists.  No player, other than Paul, has averaged double-digit assists and just 2.5 turnovers or less.  

* CP3 played in six games this season in which he dished out at least 15 assists with no more than one turnover. That equals the total of such individual performances by the rest of the league combined. Paul's six games of that type are the most in a season for any NBA player since the league began officially recording turnovers in 1977.

*****

Of course all MVP votes are cast at the end of the regular season, and before the playoffs begin, but Paul has only gone on to further prove his worth this postseason.  Here are a few more 'bonus' playoff-edition stat notes courtesy of the good folks at the Elias Sports Bureau:

* Chris Paul scored 35 points and handed out 10 assists in his first NBA playoff game, a 104-92 victory over Dallas in round one.  Paul is the first player in league history to record at least 35 points and at least 10 assists in his first NBA playoff game.  Only three other players in NBA history scored 35 or more points in their playoff debut and won the game: Wilt Chamberlain with the Philadelphia Warriors in 1960 (35 points), Kareem Abdul-Jabbar with the Bucks in 1970 (36 points), and Gary Brokaw with the 1976 Bucks (36 points).

* Chris Paul had 32 points and 17 assists in Game 2 of the Mavericks series.  It was Paul's second career postseason game.  He's the first player in NBA history with at least 30 points and 10 assists in each of his first two career playoff games and he's also the first to total as many as 67 points and 27 assists in his first two career playoff games.

* Chris Paul capped a historic playoff debut series with a triple-double in the Hornets' 99-94 win in Game 5, eliminating the Mavericks from the NBA's postseason tournament.  Over the last 20 years, the only other players to post a triple-double in their first playoff series were LeBron James (2006) and Steve Francis (2004).  Paul averaged 12.0 assists in the five-game series, the second-highest mark in NBA history by a player in his first postseason series. The record is 13.0, by Kevin Johnson in 1989.

And CP3 is at it again in the second-round.  Facing the defending champs, Paul has dominated Tony Parker and powered the Hornets to a surprising 2-0 series lead.  Sharing the same floor with the likes of Tim Duncan and Manu Ginobili, Paul has clearly been the best player over Games 1 and 2.

One final stat to leave you with: After another magical performance in the Hornets Game 2 victory over San Antonio, Paul is now averaging over 24 points per game and sporting an inconceivable 85:9 assist-to-turnover ratio through the first seven playoff games of his career!


The numbers speak for themselves.  Since Kobe Bryant has reportedly won the MVP award, he should show up to the ceremony with a mask and gloves on, because he robbed Chris Paul.

 

Check out the 2008 Playoff Weekly Stats Leaders Here

Email to a friend
Email to a friend Print Version
Print version Deliscious
del.icio.us Digg This
Digg this

About the Author: TOMMY BEER
Tommy Beer is a Senior NBA Writer and Fantasy Basketball Editor for HOOPSWORLD. An active member of the Professional Basketball Writers Association, he has been covering the NBA and the New York Knicks for the past four seasons. He has been featured as an analyst on ESPN Radio, USA Today, and NBA Radio on Sirius.

Comments (37 posted) Post your comment
Please be respectful of the writers in your comments or they will be removed
posted By Mr. Juan / Your Warlock, 6 May 2008 6:31:16 AM
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, Make sure to bring your pitch fork to the MVP ceremonies, eh Tommy.
posted By pocholo, 6 May 2008 8:06:21 AM
these are just stats. Chris Paul can get these numbers because he is the pointguard, he has the ball all the time. CP3 is good, but Kobe is greater. If you argue numbers,CP3 may lead in steals, but kobe averages a steal also per game, but kobe also blocks shot. Can CP3 block shots? Look also the stats on who is more clutch. Kobe would eventually be the one taking the gamewinner. Kobe is the best closer in the league period.
posted By jesse, 6 May 2008 9:02:39 AM
that is just your opinion. if mvp's were based solely on stats lebron would've won it this year. dont take anything away from kobe's season that this is a lifetime achievement award or anything. kobe earned the award, respect it and shut up!
posted By helboninho, 6 May 2008 9:21:28 AM
@pocholo It works the other way around as well. >KB couldn't get Pauls numbers if he played pg.
posted By dont hate, 6 May 2008 10:58:46 AM
u sound like a hater his is very good and put up great numbers but if its all about stats then all those cats u put him up to in the past would have won as well and kobe would have 3 or 4 by now it was a close race and kobe won out get over it stop hateing its over u dunce and if we go by stats give me labrons over pauls every day this year who had better stats then bron all around this year not paul
posted By Sunny, 6 May 2008 11:33:50 AM
Very boring article. Sure.. its all bla bla bla bla...
posted By Tony, 6 May 2008 11:41:11 AM
If the MVP was based sololy on Statistics -- like it was until recent years, Kobe would have 2 or 3 MVP's by now.
posted By Boost, 6 May 2008 11:48:47 AM
oh please shut up mr article writer
posted By namotuman, 6 May 2008 12:01:51 PM
cp3's numbers are fine and dandy. they are legit, but not once in your article did you mention any injuries. that's because his team has been largely INTACT the WHOLE season. kb24 has endured a knee blow out on bynum, ankle sprains to walton and gasol, not to mention his own pinkie injury he has played thru. the number of games lost to injury by key teammates of kb24's is mind boggling. so, go back to the drawing board and throw those numbers into the equation......
posted By Tommy Beer, 6 May 2008 12:02:24 PM
Why is it that anytime someone makes an argument for a player other than Kobe – it is b/c they are a “hater.” Are all Kobe supporters “CP3 Haters?,” Can’t it just be an opinion Paul is more ‘valuable’ than Kobe? As I said, Kobe had a great season. He is the best player in the NBA. But that does not mean he deserves the MVP award this season.
posted By dondi, 6 May 2008 12:03:40 PM
definetly your last name is very accurate that's what you have being drinking when you wrote this article BEER BEER BEER
posted By Tommy Beer, 6 May 2008 12:03:52 PM
I am not saying that Paul deserves the MVP based solely on his statistics. In fact I state that specifically. The combination of Paul’s other-worldly stats, in addition to the undeniable role he played in New Orleans emergence to the league’s elite, is the reason he should win MVP. However, we could endlessly debate things like “who makes their teammates better,” or who “has a greater impact on the game” all day without ever coming close to an answer. But stats are useful because they are quantifiable. And CP3’s numbers are off-the-charts…
posted By Jack Bauer, 6 May 2008 12:13:53 PM
STOP IT!,...STOP IT!...Just STOP IT!!!...Im just sick of the HATE'N...STOP THE FISHING! Looking for EXCUSE, after EXCUSE, after EXCUSE to NOT give Kobe MVP honors. First its whom ever finishes with the best record. But because the EAST was so bad overall and we were witnessing an historical playoff race in in the WEST, it became all about who finishes the WEST on top,(Kobe did that). So then its who makes his teammates better(Kobe did that) AND so forth... TRUTH IS THAT because of Kobe's fiasco in Colorado there are some of you that just won't let it go. And instead of being a Man/Woman about it and not beating around the real issue at hand, writers mask their personal feelings with bulls*%t like this and throw out numbers, stats,formulas and redefining what it means to be MVP all as a masquerade to the SIMPLE fact that they just don't like the guy for their own personal reasons. Kobe is the MVP and has been for some time now...ACCEPT IT!!!
posted By david, 6 May 2008 12:37:13 PM
Mr. Beer, stop drinking and start watching NBA.
posted By Bill Ingram, 6 May 2008 12:42:32 PM
As I've said many times in articles and on boards, there's a great argument to be made for CP3. If the Hornets had finished one game ahead of the Lakers instead of the other way around, it would be an air-tight argument. When the Lakers finished with the best record, it gave Kobe a slight - ***ever so slight*** - advantage.
posted By rasaan86, 6 May 2008 12:54:14 PM
Finally somebody who is on the same page as me when it comes to stats, I been saying all along that cp3 is the MVP his numbers improved, kobes numbers dipped off, and also he was crying and complaining about his team in the begginning of the season while paul was just a sole leader
posted By kobe bryant, 6 May 2008 1:47:55 PM
im MVP --- =)
posted By HC, 6 May 2008 2:38:39 PM
You're nut!
posted By Sumeet, 6 May 2008 2:45:48 PM
stats? you're talking about stats? you realize Dirk put up his worst stats last year and got the MVP? it ain't stats, otherwise LeBron would've won this year.
posted By Marc, 6 May 2008 6:33:23 PM
ummmm.....u guys really hate Kobe. Paul has nice stats..that's nice. but he only played like this after the allstar weekend. Kobe has been consistent all year. Lakers were a top team even when Kwame n smush were around...The Hornets didnt have West or Peja miss a month...i bet you if they did they would be playing the Lakers right now. kobe scored 4 50 games to keep the lakers in the 7th seed last year...he didnt get the award. For Lakers to be on top this year..in a tight western race...he deserved it. not to mention the hornets had it but the Lakers spanked them n the Spurs. Kobe is the mvp n nothing u say will change it. So move on. Dirk wont it when the mavs went on a good run but his stats weren't that good. Analyze that.
posted By Lakerfanatic!, 6 May 2008 10:11:00 PM
Kobe is in Michael Jordan status right now! He is about to run off 5 or 6 championships. CP3 and Lebron and everybody else are all going to be his ---es,These 2008 Lakers are starting to remind me of the 1991 bulls. They have all the pieces,and this will not be Kobe's last MVP, So suck it up and take it like a man.
posted By Kobe4MVP oh wait he always is, 6 May 2008 11:41:18 PM
this article is very boring. statistics MEAN NOTHING!!! like some said if it was all based on stats then kobe should have won MVP 3 years in a row already. after all the drama with the Lakers this season and with all these injuries the lakers still managed to get 1st seed. no matter what argument saying chris paul for mvp. in the end when it all comes down all fingers point to KB24, not some reaching in, traveling point guard in cp3.
posted By THA!, 7 May 2008 1:11:01 PM
I don't see how you can give an MVP award to someone who wanted out from the team. Yes Kobe had a great year. But what kind of message are we sending if we reward him in this situation? If anything, Kobe should've been Most Improved Player based on how he turned things around personally/professionally and how he's elevated his team's play.
posted By Paul, Rialto, CA, 7 May 2008 1:48:42 PM
You don't happen to have a daughter that works in Denver do you? She used to work at a Hotel? Some resort? Cute girl, nice, but made some bad decisions maybe? Ring a bell?
posted By Andy, 7 May 2008 2:57:44 PM
I don’t think the stats go the distance though. Paul’s presence makes his teammates better players, and he’s intimidating to the other team. Kobe’s intimidating to the other team, but I don’t think that his teammates are better than they would be with another shooting guard. Watch Morris Peterson (career underachiever and guy that you just can’t count on) when he’s on the floor with Paul working off picks and squaring on the curls. Watch Stojakovic as he actually tries to play defense to be a part of the team at both ends. Watch David West’s transition from 3rd tier prospect to deserving All-Star. Watch Tyson Chandler score on alley oops and never have to take fade away jumpers out of the post or work hard to get buckets, he can now focus solely on defense and let Paul give him scores.
posted By poyorick, 7 May 2008 4:26:01 PM
While I think there can be some very legitimate arguments made for Chris Paul winning the MVP, I think this article does a poor job of making one. The writer cites many impressive statistics but doesn't put them into the context of an MVP argument. The body of the argument doesn't match up with what it claims to show. The statistics cited generally tend to show that CP3 is an excellent point guard. In fact, if you replaced the introduction (first 4 paragraphs) with something like "Chris Paul is the best PG the NBA has seen in at least 15 years" you would have a much better article (at least in terms of logical flow). Also, the "bonus section" hurts the credibility of the arguments. The writer is going beyond the scope of the award (regular season) to prove his point. I mean if Chris Paul wins an MVP in 2011, will we also cite that as how he deserved it in 2008? Finally, if you really want to make a solid MVP argument you could follow something like this. 1) Introduce MVP argument (you can list possible candidates here, which the writer does here) 2) Define MVP (this is where you put what the MVP means, or at least the criteria you are going to be using). The writer sort of does this, but weakly. He writes: "the one thing we can clearly quantify is the statistical bottom line." 3) Apply "facts" to your criteria. You can use stats here (like CP3s incredible 20/10 avg) or other observations (like how KG has "transformed" the Celtics D and attitude). You also have to address why the other choices do not meet the MVP criteria as well as your candidate. At this point if you are going to dismiss a candidate, give a reason why. For example if you are going to say that LeBron James doesn't deserve the MVP, you can't just say "Bron had a good year but he didn't deserve the MVP." You should say something like "Bron had a good year, but didn't deserve the MVP BECAUSE ________________ (fill in the blank). You can fill in the blank with whatever you want, but the most relevant and thorough reasons will provide you best argument (for example: "his team didn't win nearly as many games as the other candidates' teams" or "he doesn't play at both ends of the floor like Kobe, CP3 and KG do"). The more thorough and relevant this section, the better the argument (This article has some length, but the facts don't quite paint the picture because they don't really link the stats to most valuable. Also the writer doesn't explain how the stats of others fall short). 4) You can confidently state your conclusion. Of course this is just a guideline and you have to use your discretion (some arguments involve 4 guys, some only 2 guys). You don't have to rule out every single player, but by addressing other players you are essentially addressing the weaknesses of your argument proactively. Check out Bill Simmons MVP argument and you'll see this structure. He's a great example of how to make a good sports arguments.
posted By Adam, 7 May 2008 4:32:10 PM
Finally! I've been saying this since the MVP debate heated up. The stats don't lie.. CP3 is having one of the best seasons of all time at the point guard position. And if you do your research, you'll also notice that Kobe's stats are down in almost every statistical category from last year. He's averaging the same amount of assists as he did the year before when he took more shots. Another thing worth noting, is that the Lakers went from middle of the pack in the Western Conference to top dog only AFTER the trade for Pau Gasol. Coincidence? I think not.
posted By Adam, 7 May 2008 4:37:23 PM
And, people sure are quick to forget about the way Kobe acted at the beginning of the year before he was on a contending team. He basically acted like a 5 yr. old in a toy store, stomping his feet, and holding his breath until someone in the front office either got him out of L.A. or brought another piece to team Kobe. He publicly called out his team, his front office, and his owner. He was booed on opening night in L.A.!! Hopefully, though the Hornets and Lakers will meet up in the West Finals, and this debate can be resolved.
posted By Stu, 7 May 2008 4:55:51 PM
Great article... I think you just need to ignore the Kobe fans. Arguing with them only makes the stronger, and you're never going to change their mind. If Paul continues to play like he did this year, it won't be long before he has more MVP awards than Kobe.
posted By mladboy, 7 May 2008 5:38:33 PM
Ok, I tried to read all the comments, but got bored. I think most of you people are extremists. Kobe Bryant has had his probably best season yet, and do you know why? Because he's finally learned to share the ball and actually trust his teammates. That, however, does not mean he deserves to be the MVP. LBJ and CP3 are both extraordinary players, who are even at this point in their careers, better than Bryant. That's why I'm really disgusted at the fact that they will not get the MVP award simply because they're too young, and Kobe's been in the league so long and hasn't got it. I don't care about his "incident", I'm interested in his game, and it's not MVP game, compared to those two guys. But you know what - LeBron and Chris are going to keep playing and getting even better, and in a couple of years when Kobe's a non-factor in the league, they will be basketball deities, shutting up all of you...
posted By Thomas K, 7 May 2008 8:37:00 PM
I do agree with you only if Kobe was not a basketball player. CP3 is a great point guard and you are so right when you compare him to Nash, 2 MVP trophies that he did not deserve you have to make your teammates better on both side of the floor. Now lets compare him To Kobe this year it was very close to call because I for one would have probably given the vote to CP3 but then I watched them both on the defensive end and I gave the edge to Kobe, Sorry CP3 maybe next year.
posted By Jack R., 7 May 2008 9:08:09 PM
Blah. The Lakers won the Western Conference despite being one of the most injured teams in the league this year. No one else accomplished what Kobe accomplished this year.
posted By krc, 8 May 2008 8:19:05 AM
i'm with you tommy. kobe had a great year no doubt about it. but chris paul is my mvp maybe for the single fact that hes hands down the most exciting player to watch this year. the kid has skills which never fail to amaze me.
posted By Law, 8 May 2008 10:03:40 AM
Mr Beer, do you know how to play basketball? Else, let Kobe teach you..
posted By Tommy Beer, 8 May 2008 10:43:12 AM
Thanks for the spirited responses everyone. Kobe is such a polarizing figure, it is amazing. Let’s hope that CP3 and Kobe both take their teams to the Conference Finals – so they can square off and intensify this debate…
posted By Zander, 8 May 2008 4:15:53 PM
Very good article to show the other side of the debate. Sorry Tommy but the rest of the world knows that when it comes to educated fans, laker fans come in dead last, so god forbid you mention their idol isnt the greatest thing ever, and they will lose it. Kobe had a GOOD year. Gasol made the difference. I would have voted for Paul, but then again I would have voted for Kobe the year Dirk and Nash won (nashs first one) Still its absurd to think youre hating because the stats show Paul was better. STATS MEAN SOMETHING. Its quantifiable evidence. And please stop with the best closer BS. Stats also show Kobe isnt very good. He just shoots 20 game winners a year, makes 4 but those four whip the delusional Laker fans into a frenzy. Yes Kobe should have won an MVP. Just not this years.
posted By Mr. Juan Your Warlock, 13 May 2008 2:41:57 AM
To Imply Paul's overall stats are better than Kobe's is strictly fools gold ... Here are the Facts using "TOTALS/AVERAGES" [Points: Kobe 2323/28.33-Paul 1684/20.05] [Rebounds: Kobe 517/6.30-Paul 321/4.00] [Assists: Paul 925/11.56-Kobe 441/5.38] [Steals: Paul 217/2.70-Kobe 151/1.84] [Blocks: Kobe 40/.50-Paul 4/.05] ... During the entire year, Kobe out scored Paul by 40%, out rebounded Paul by 60%, and blocked 10 times the amount of shots Paul did. In contrast, Paul registered slightly over 2 times Kobe's assists totals, and registered 43% more steals. Percentages for all intent and purposes were a wash: (FG%, 3PT%, FT%) with Kobe attempting a much higher percentage on all 3 categories ... And lets not forget-(NEVER FORGET)-who is the better lock down defender or overall defensive player for that matter... need I even say! ... This Article is completely and totally bias, presented for fools to ponder ... FOOLS GOLD, Y'ALL lemon juice BAK NAU HEAR!



Checkout HOOPSWORLD on


NBA
NBA Rumors
NBA Salaries
NBA Newswire
NBA Transactions
NBA Trade History
NBA Stats
NBA Standings
NBA Teams
NBA Chats
NCAA BASKETBALL
NCAA Scores
NCAA Stats
NCAA Newswire
NCAA Standings
NBA DRAFT
Top 100 Prospects
Mock Draft
Owed Draft Picks
ABOUT THE SITE
RSS Feeds
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Advertise With Us
Site Map
 

 


 
USA Today 
NBA Salaries  
NBA Teams  

Bookmark and Share

Email to a friend
Email to a friend
Print Version
Print version
Deliscious
del.icio.us
Digg This
Digg this
DID YOU ENJOY THIS ARTICLE

Avg Rating 4.3/5
 (total 6 votes)



TOP STORIES







PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS AND CONDITIONS | CONTACT US | SITE MAP | RSS FEEDS
AmericanEagle.com
© 2007 Fantasy Sports Ventures